[U-Boot] [PATCH 12/12] imx: ventana: switch to SPL

Tim Harvey tharvey at gateworks.com
Wed May 14 06:58:51 CEST 2014


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 06/05/2014 20:18, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>
>> Stefano / York,
>>
>> While preparing for a v3 patch series of my IMX6 SPL bootloader, I
>> find that commit dec1861be90c948ea9fb771927d3d26a994d2e20 [1] breaks
>> the above code because gd is now needed within setup_i2c.
>>
>> I've always been a bit fuzzy on the order of the above calls so I dug
>> through the code and I think I understand things better. Please
>> correct any wrong assumptions I'm making below:
>>  - assignment to gd should 'always' be first (before anything needs
>> it, so why not do it first)
>>  - arch_cpu_init() should go next as this sets up very low level
>> CPU/SoC resources (in this case AIPS config and watchdog disable)
>>  - board_early_init_f() should be next as that sets up any board-specific iomux
>>  - any additional iomux necessary for SPL should go next (I take care
>> of i2c iomux and setup here)
>>  - timer_init() next as you need a timer for UART and mxc i2c (for
>> delays and busy checks)
>>  - preloader_console_init() next as we are now able to send something
>> over the UART (this gives me early debug for sdram config now too!)
>>  - sdram setup goes next
>>  - after sdram is setup, the bss can be cleared
>>  - board_init_r - pass over to generic SPL code which will load/call
>> an image based on boot device
>
> I think your analyses is correct.
>
>>
>> So, if the above is correct, I should rework the above function as follows:
>>
>> void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
>> {
>>         struct ventana_board_info ventana_info;
>>         int board_model;
>>
>>         /* Set global data pointer. */
>>         gd = &gdata;
>>
>>         /* setup AIPS and disable watchdog */
>>         arch_cpu_init();
>>
>>         /* iomux and setup of i2c */
>>         board_early_init_f();
>>         i2c_setup_iomux();
>>
>>         /* setup GP timer */
>>         timer_init();
>>
>>         /* UART clocks enabled and gd valid - init serial console */
>>         preloader_console_init();
>>
>>         /* read/validate EEPROM info to determine board model and SDRAM cfg */
>>         board_model = read_eeprom(I2C_GSC, &ventana_info);
>>
>>         /* provide some some default: 32bit 128MB */
>>         if (GW_UNKNOWN == board_model) {
>>                 ventana_info.sdram_width = 2;
>>                 ventana_info.sdram_size = 3;
>>         }
>>
>>         /* configure MMDC for SDRAM width/size and per-model calibration */
>>         spl_dram_init(8 << ventana_info.sdram_width,
>>                       16 << ventana_info.sdram_size,
>>                       board_model);
>>
>>         /* Clear the BSS. */
>>         memset(__bss_start, 0, __bss_end - __bss_start);
>>
>>         /* load/boot image from boot device */
>>         board_init_r(NULL, 0);
>> }
>
> It seems reasonable, go on this way.
>
> Regards,
> Stefano
>

Stefano,

I've just found that one of my boards fails with the above re-org.
Strangely a board which has the same mem layout, mem width/size, CPU
and nand does not fail.

If I make the following change:


More information about the U-Boot mailing list