[U-Boot] NAND custodian (was Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] enable support for x16 NAND devices)

[Gupta, Pekon]

>From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:hs at denx.de]
>>Am 28.05.2014 23:00, schrieb Tom Rini:
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:21:21PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 11:48 +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote:

[...]

>>>> This series few other patch series are awaiting response from
>>>> long time.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay -- I've been fairly busy, and don't usually get
>>> around to processing U-Boot patches until after the merge window closes.
>>> The IRC channel topic has been lying and saying the merge window is
>>> still open (also, http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle says that
>>> the merge window is open and will close in negative 24 days).
>>
>> Bah, I always forget to update those parts as well, beyond the actual
>> releases...
>>
>>> Given that I don't do much with NAND myself these days, that the patch
>>> volume is higher than when I started as NAND custodian, and that I now
>>> have maintainership duties in Linux competing for my time, I'm wondering
>>> if someone else (maybe you or Heiko?) wants to step into the NAND
>>> custodian role.
>>
>> It's been a pleasure working with you.  Pekon? Heiko?  Either of you
>> interested in this particular role?  Thanks!
>
>I am not a NAND expert and I am little bit under water currently...
>(but if nobody else volunteers I can try it ...)
>
>Pekon?
>
>bye,
>Heiko

Yes, Heiko please proceed.
I might be transitioning to new work soon. So for few months I don't
want to commit for something which I might not be able to fulfill.
But I'll surely help in reviewing the patches, apart from OMAP ones.

Also looping "Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>" CFI flash custodian [1] as he
has helped in reviewing many OMAP and MTD/NAND patches.
Stefan ?

It would be good, if the custodianship is transferred bit gradually at
stable release, so that we don't miss any old reviews and feedback.

[1] http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Custodians

with regards, pekon