[U-Boot] [PATCH 16/33] x86: Add basic i8259 implementation
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 08:21:31 CET 2014
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> The i8259 is a basic interrupt controller from the 1970s which is still
> present in modern Intel hardware. Add some code to set it up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h | 3 +
> arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/lib/i8259.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/i8259.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
> index 73113f9..bac073d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
> @@ -69,4 +69,7 @@
> #define ICW4_AEOI 0x02 /* Automatic EOI Mode */
> #define ICW4_PM 0x01 /* Microprocessor Mode */
>
> +void i8259_setup(void);
> +void i8259_configure_irq_trigger(int int_num, bool is_level_triggered);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> index d0c7f30..2d75f9f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM) += bootm.o
> obj-y += cmd_boot.o
> obj-y += gcc.o
> +obj-y += i8259.o
> obj-y += init_helpers.o
> obj-y += interrupts.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SYS_PCAT_INTERRUPTS) += pcat_interrupts.o
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/i8259.c b/arch/x86/lib/i8259.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..442d904
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/i8259.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
> +/*
> + * From Coreboot file of the same name
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 coresystems GmbH
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/i8259.h>
> +
> +#define MASTER_PIC_ICW1 0x20
> +#define SLAVE_PIC_ICW1 0xa0
> +#define ICW_SELECT (1 << 4)
> +#define OCW_SELECT (0 << 4)
> +#define ADI (1 << 2)
> +#define SNGL (1 << 1)
> +#define IC4 (1 << 0)
> +
> +#define MASTER_PIC_ICW2 0x21
> +#define SLAVE_PIC_ICW2 0xa1
> +#define INT_VECTOR_MASTER 0x20
> +#define IRQ0 0x00
> +#define IRQ1 0x01
> +#define INT_VECTOR_SLAVE 0x28
> +#define IRQ8 0x00
> +#define IRQ9 0x01
> +
> +#define MASTER_PIC_ICW3 0x21
> +#define CASCADED_PIC (1 << 2)
> +
> +#define MASTER_PIC_ICW4 0x21
> +#define SLAVE_PIC_ICW4 0xa1
> +#define MICROPROCESSOR_MODE (1 << 0)
> +
> +#define SLAVE_PIC_ICW3 0xa1
> +#define SLAVE_ID 0x02
> +
> +#define MASTER_PIC_OCW1 0x21
> +#define SLAVE_PIC_OCW1 0xa1
> +#define IRQ2 (1 << 2)
> +#define ALL_IRQS 0xff
> +
> +#define ELCR1 0x4d0
> +#define ELCR2 0x4d1
> +
> +void i8259_setup(void)
> +{
> + /* A write to ICW1 starts the Interrupt Controller Initialization
> + * Sequence. This implicitly causes the following to happen:
> + * - Interrupt Mask register is cleared
> + * - Priority 7 is assigned to IRQ7 input
> + * - Slave mode address is set to 7
> + * - Special mask mode is cleared
> + *
> + * We send the initialization sequence to both the master and
> + * slave i8259 controller.
> + */
> + outb(ICW_SELECT|IC4, MASTER_PIC_ICW1);
> + outb(ICW_SELECT|IC4, SLAVE_PIC_ICW1);
> +
> + /* Now the interrupt controller expects us to write to ICW2. */
> + outb(INT_VECTOR_MASTER | IRQ0, MASTER_PIC_ICW2);
> + outb(INT_VECTOR_SLAVE | IRQ8, SLAVE_PIC_ICW2);
> +
> + /* Now the interrupt controller expects us to write to ICW3.
> + *
> + * The normal scenario is to set up cascading on IRQ2 on the master
> + * i8259 and assign the slave ID 2 to the slave i8259.
> + */
> + outb(CASCADED_PIC, MASTER_PIC_ICW3);
> + outb(SLAVE_ID, SLAVE_PIC_ICW3);
> +
> + /* Now the interrupt controller expects us to write to ICW4.
> + *
> + * We switch both i8259 to microprocessor mode because they're
> + * operating as part of an x86 architecture based chipset
> + */
> + outb(MICROPROCESSOR_MODE, MASTER_PIC_ICW2);
> + outb(MICROPROCESSOR_MODE, SLAVE_PIC_ICW2);
> +
> + /* Now clear the interrupts through OCW1.
> + * First we mask off all interrupts on the slave interrupt controller
> + * then we mask off all interrupts but interrupt 2 on the master
> + * controller. This way the cascading stays alife.
> + */
> + outb(ALL_IRQS, SLAVE_PIC_OCW1);
> + outb(ALL_IRQS & ~IRQ2, MASTER_PIC_OCW1);
> + debug("i8259 inited\n");
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * i8259_configure_irq_trigger() - Configure IRQ triggering
> + *
> + * Switch the given interrupt to be level / edge triggered
> + *
> + * @param int_num legacy interrupt number (3-7, 9-15)
> + * @param is_level_triggered true for level triggered interrupt, false for
> + * edge triggered interrupt
> + */
> +void i8259_configure_irq_trigger(int int_num, bool is_level_triggered)
> +{
> + u16 int_bits = inb(ELCR1) | (((u16)inb(ELCR2)) << 8);
> +
> + debug("%s: current interrupts are 0x%x\n", __func__, int_bits);
> + if (is_level_triggered)
> + int_bits |= (1 << int_num);
> + else
> + int_bits &= ~(1 << int_num);
> +
> + /* Write new values */
> + debug("%s: try to set interrupts 0x%x\n", __func__, int_bits);
> + outb((u8)(int_bits & 0xff), ELCR1);
> + outb((u8)(int_bits >> 8), ELCR2);
> +
> +#ifdef PARANOID_IRQ_TRIGGERS
> + /*
> + * Try reading back the new values. This seems like an error but is
> + * not
> + */
> + if (inb(ELCR1) != (int_bits & 0xff)) {
> + printf("%s: lower order bits are wrong: want 0x%x, got 0x%x\n",
> + __func__, (int_bits & 0xff), inb(ELCR1));
> + }
> +
> + if (inb(ELCR2) != (int_bits >> 8)) {
> + printf("%s: higher order bits are wrong: want 0x%x, got 0x%x\n",
> + __func__, (int_bits>>8), inb(ELCR2));
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +
> --
Can you make the changes to the existing
arch/x86/lib/pcat_interrupts.c which is also the i8259 pic driver
initialization?
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list