[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add PCIe-related pins to the Jetson TK1 pinmux tables

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:34:49 -0600, Stephen Warren
<swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:

> On 10/15/2014 05:43 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:14:24 +0000, Tom Warren <TWarren at nvidia.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Albert,
> >>
> >> Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master. Thanks!
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit a7f99bf139b3aaa0d5494693fd0395084355e41a:
> >>
> >>    arm: Fix _start for CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG (2014-09-11 18:04:39 +0200)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>    git://git.denx.de/u-boot-tegra.git master
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 90a565acf3a18c61170ec0e0b2046c98cb7ecc85:
> >>
> >>    arm: tegra: initial support for apalis t30 (2014-09-17 11:15:04 -0700)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Marcel Ziswiler (1):
> >>        arm: tegra: initial support for apalis t30
> >>
> >> Stephen Warren (1):
> >>        ARM: tegra: add PCIe-related pins to the Jetson TK1 pinmux tables
> >
> > This new board fails when I merge this branch to u-boot-arm/master,
> > with the following diagnostics:
> >
> > include/configs/apalis_t30.h:17:0: warning: "CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE"
> > redefined [enabled by default]
> > In file included
> > from /home/albert.u.boot/src/u-boot-arm/include/linux/kconfig.h:4:0,
> >                   from <command-line>:0:
> > include/generated/autoconf.h:8:0: note: this is the location of the
> > previous definition
> >
> > (actually, there is a lot of these, for various config options)
> >
> > Device Tree Source is not correctly specified.
> > Please define 'CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE'
> > or build with 'DEVICE_TREE=<device_tree>' argument
> >
> > (This one is fatal even though it does not explicitly state "error:")
> >
> > This failure does not happen on the tegra branch; it is obviously due
> > to the Kbuild stuff.
> 
> This issue should be fixed by:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/398793/
> [U-Boot] tegra: apalis_t30: master revamp
> 
> However, I would assert that at this point during the release cycle, we 
> probably shouldn't be adding new boards/features, but just fixing bugs. 
> Perhaps we should drop the Apalis patch completely and re-apply it once 
> the release is out?

Ok. Should I still apply the TK1 pinmux patch, or should I consider the
whole PR to be for -next?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.