[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] imx: mx6ul_14x14_evk add ENET support

[Peng Fan]

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
>On 03/08/2015 13:32, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Fabio,
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:39:33AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan at freescale.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       setup_iomux_fec(CONFIG_FEC_ENET_DEV);
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = fecmxc_initialize_multi(bis, CONFIG_FEC_ENET_DEV,
>>>> +               CONFIG_FEC_MXC_PHYADDR, IMX_FEC_BASE);
>>>> +       if (ret)
>>>> +               printf("FEC%d MXC: %s:failed\n", CONFIG_FEC_ENET_DEV, __func__);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>
>>> You are returning 0 even if there is an error.
>>>
>>> You could simply do:
>>>
>>>       return fecmxc_initialize_multi(bis, CONFIG_FEC_ENET_DEV,
>>>               CONFIG_FEC_MXC_PHYADDR, IMX_FEC_BASE);
>> 
>> Thanks, will fix in V2.
>> 
>>>
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int setup_fec(int fec_id)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct iomuxc *const iomuxc_regs = (struct iomuxc *)IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (0 == fec_id) {
>>>
>>> Can you do if (!fec_id)?
>> Why need to change to (!fec_id)? I do not see benifits to use (!fec_id).
>
>No changes for the compiler, but this is like codestyle. You do not see
>(maybe some exceptions ?) ( 0 == variable) in U-Boot code.
>

Ok. Will fix this and same piece code in other patches.

Thanks,
Peng.

>Best regards,
>Stefano Babic
>
>
>
>-- 
>=====================================================================
>DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
>HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
>Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
>=====================================================================

--