[U-Boot] [RFC] m68k: generic board

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:41:04PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/02/2015 17:02, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:39:13AM +0000, Huan Wang wrote:
> >>Hi, Tom,
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:08:40PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> >>>>Dear all,
> >>>>
> >>>>i would like to post a patch with the m68k generic board support,
> >>>>tested and working here, but of course not tested for all the other
> >>>>m68k boards except mine.
> >>>>
> >>>>My coldfire board is the "amcore" board not yet accepted.
> >>>>
> >>>>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/193661
> >>>>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/193660
> >>>>
> >>>>I need some suggestions on how to proceed now.
> >>>>
> >>>>I already modified my board config to work with generic board support.
> >>>>
> >>>>So my thought is to post 2 separate patches:
> >>>>1
> >>>>- add generic board (1/1). Each board maintainer should then test it
> >>>>and report for feedbacks.
> >>>>2
> >>>>Re-post a 2/2 patch (v8) of amcore using generic board:
> >>>>- amcore board (1),
> >>>>- mcf5307 support (2),
> >>>>
> >>>>This amcore board is the coldfire base i use here for all the general
> >>>>m68k tests.
> >>>>
> >>>>With your help commenting on this patch until it is conformant to the
> >>>>last recent coding guidelines could help me and Alison to know what
> >>>>has to be purged / changed, (eventually, if needed) in all other m68k
> >>>>boards code.
> >>>>
> >>>>What do you think ?
> >>>
> >>>Lets go with #2 and we'll purge the rest of the boards that you don't
> >>>want to convert and compile test after -rc1.  Thanks!
> >>>
> >>[Alison Wang] Do you mean you will purge the rest of the boards if
> >>they are not converted and tested?
> >>
> >>I have these boards, such as m52277evb, m5253demo, m53017evb,
> >>m5329evb, m5373evb, m54418twr, m54451evb, m54455evb, m547xevb and
> >>m548xevb. I think I really need some time to convert and test them.
> >
> >Please get them converted ASAP and remove the rest of the boards which
> >you do not plan to support.  Thanks!
> 
> Dear Tom and all,
> 
> so basically, i posted a patch with with 1 and 2 together, since
> "amcore" board and m68k generic-board additions was connected.
> 
> Alison then added some changes over my generic-board patch.
> 
> What is now the correct way to proceed, as m68k custodians ? We need to
> wait for feedbacks/ack on the patches or, at what stage could we apply
> this patches into the u-boot-coldfire repo ?

Go ahead and push them to u-boot-coldfire and send me a PR as they've
been in public for long enough without further comments, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150224/09804259/attachment.sig>