[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model

[Simon Glass]

Hi Albert,

On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hello Albert,
>
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
>> Hello Simon,
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Albert,
>> >
>> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > > Hi Albert,
>> > >
>> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
>> > >> Hello Simon,
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff;
>> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series
>> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be
>> > >> applied exactly?
>> > >
>> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series
>> > > starting here:
>> > >
>> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/
>> > >
>> > > The cover letter is here:
>> > >
>> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429
>> > >
>> > > So that is all now.
>> >
>> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the
>> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working
>> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5.
>>
>> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4.
>
> V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a
> try at u-boot-dm/spl-working.

OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied
something up. I can resend if you like.

Regards,
Simon