[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hello Simon,

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:57:05 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> > Hello Albert,
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> >> Hello Simon,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Albert,
> >> >
> >> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >> > > Hi Albert,
> >> > >
> >> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> >> > >> Hello Simon,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff;
> >> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series
> >> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be
> >> > >> applied exactly?
> >> > >
> >> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series
> >> > > starting here:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/
> >> > >
> >> > > The cover letter is here:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429
> >> > >
> >> > > So that is all now.
> >> >
> >> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the
> >> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working
> >> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5.
> >>
> >> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4.
> >
> > V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a
> > try at u-boot-dm/spl-working.
> 
> OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied
> something up. I can resend if you like.

Well, if you can re-send rebase over current u-boot[-arm]/master, that
would be nice. :)

> Regards,
> Simon



Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.