[U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl/usb: enable the errata-a005697 for ls1012a

[Jerry Huang]

York, 
I don't know the file " arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/soc.h " is not included for ls1021a, maybe ls1021a is one special ARM SoC.
Now I will add one macro " CONFIG_LS1012A " to resolve this issue.

Best Regards
Jerry Huang


-----Original Message-----
From: york sun 
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 3:10 AM
To: Jerry Huang <jerry.huang at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl/usb: enable the errata-a005697 for ls1012a

On 11/29/2016 06:39 PM, Jerry Huang wrote:
> Any comment for this patch?
>
> Best Regards
> Jerry Huang
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Changming Huang [mailto:jerry.huang at nxp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 3:14 PM
> To: york sun <york.sun at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Jerry Huang <jerry.huang at nxp.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] fsl/usb: enable the errata-a005697 for ls1012a
>
> Enable the errata-a005697 for ls1012a
>
> Signed-off-by: Changming Huang <jerry.huang at nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/common/fsl-errata.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/fsl-errata.c 
> b/drivers/usb/common/fsl-errata.c index 0dc3dd8..59a69a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/common/fsl-errata.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/fsl-errata.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ bool has_erratum_a005697(void)
>  	case SVR_9132:
>  		return IS_SVR_REV(svr, 1, 0) || IS_SVR_REV(svr, 1, 1);  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +	case SVR_LS1012A:
> +		return IS_SVR_REV(svr, 1, 0);
> +#endif
>  	}

Actually this patch has a problem with the SVR. SVR_LS1012A is defined in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/soc.h. You will see compiling errors for LS1021A, eg ls1021atwr_nor.

York