[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] test/py: Add option to skip SPL signature checking

[Michal Simek]

On 23.2.2016 18:17, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 02:40 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Provide user option to skip SPL signature verification for cases where
>> u-boot is build with SPL support but full U-Boot is also verified
>> without SPL.
>>
>> If you want to support this feature please add env__spl_skipped = True
>> to your boardenv configuration file.
>>
>> For example Xilinx Zynq is using this feature where the same U-Boot
>> binary is checked with SPL and without SPL(with FSBL).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> 
> Actually, NAK now...

I have removed your lines from v3.

> 
>> diff --git a/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
>> b/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
>> index d6502c6e64cb..b48d07261ff2 100644
>> --- a/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
>> +++ b/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
>> @@ -307,7 +307,9 @@ class ConsoleBase(object):
>>               config_spl = bcfg.get('config_spl', 'n') == 'y'
>>               config_spl_serial_support =
>> bcfg.get('config_spl_serial_support',
>>                                                    'n') == 'y'
>> -            if config_spl and config_spl_serial_support:
>> +            config_spl_skip = self.config.env.get('env_spl_skipped',
>> +                                                  False)
> 
> I was talking about renaming the Python variable config_spl_skip, not
> the boardenv_*.py variable env__spl_skipped.
> 
> The boardenv_*.py variable should be env__* to match existing variables
> in the Python file.
> 
> I was requesting that the Python variable be named env_... not
> config_... since it contains "board environment" not "config" data.

I misunderstood your description in v1.
Hopefully in v3 this will be correct.

> (BTW, you probably want to Cc Tom Rini on the next patch version since I
> assume he'd apply this)

Done.

Thanks,
Michal