[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/8] ARMv7: PSCI: add PSCI v1.0 support

[Hongbo Zhang]

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04-07-16 09:20, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>>
>> I said I would send a new iteration of this series, but there are code
>> dependencies/conflicts with Chenyu's work, so I'd like to wait for a
>> few more days to see his v2 sent out or even been merged.
>> During this stage, any review comments are still appreciated, I am
>> always looking at this.
>
>
> In that case you can probably best base your work on the u-boot-sunxi next
> branch, that currently still has v1 of Chen-Yu's patches, but I do not think
> things will change that much:
>
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-sunxi.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
>
OK, I see

> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Hongbo Zhang <macro.wave.z at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:26 PM, york sun <york.sun at nxp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/15/2016 12:16 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM,  <macro.wave.z at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang at nxp.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v5 changes:
>>>>>> - Give up fixing the potential bug of PSCI stack overlap with secure
>>>>>> text end
>>>>>> when there is more CPUs in system. Because I just want to keep this
>>>>>> series as
>>>>>> simple as it could be: adding basic PSCI v1.0 support and adding more
>>>>>> PSCI
>>>>>> v1.0 implements of our platform.
>>>>>> While too compplicated patches in assembly language won't call for
>>>>>> effective
>>>>>> reviews, even I think there is potential bug of PSCI stack, let's fix
>>>>>> it in
>>>>>> sepetated patch later.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've done some patches fixing the stack allocation issue:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/c-psci-part2
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches are ready, but I want to add a secure data section still.
>>>>> The data section will be for variables such as target PC, core/cluster
>>>>> power status, context ID, etc.. IMHO this is better than putting stuff
>>>>> at the top or bottom of the stack, and can also be referenced directly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chenyu,
>>>>
>>>> I see you have been working on PSCI for ARMv7. Can you review Hongbo's
>>>> patch set and give your comment or ack?
>>>>
>>>> York
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thank Chenyu for valuable review comments, thank you York.
>>> Will send another version soon.