[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/8] ARMv7: PSCI: add PSCI v1.0 support

[york sun]

On 07/04/2016 07:26 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04-07-16 09:20, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> I said I would send a new iteration of this series, but there are code
>>> dependencies/conflicts with Chenyu's work, so I'd like to wait for a
>>> few more days to see his v2 sent out or even been merged.
>>> During this stage, any review comments are still appreciated, I am
>>> always looking at this.
>>
>>
>> In that case you can probably best base your work on the u-boot-sunxi next
>> branch, that currently still has v1 of Chen-Yu's patches, but I do not think
>> things will change that much:
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-sunxi.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
>>
> OK, I see
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Hongbo Zhang <macro.wave.z at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:26 PM, york sun <york.sun at nxp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/15/2016 12:16 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM,  <macro.wave.z at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang at nxp.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v5 changes:
>>>>>>> - Give up fixing the potential bug of PSCI stack overlap with secure
>>>>>>> text end
>>>>>>> when there is more CPUs in system. Because I just want to keep this
>>>>>>> series as
>>>>>>> simple as it could be: adding basic PSCI v1.0 support and adding more
>>>>>>> PSCI
>>>>>>> v1.0 implements of our platform.
>>>>>>> While too compplicated patches in assembly language won't call for
>>>>>>> effective
>>>>>>> reviews, even I think there is potential bug of PSCI stack, let's fix
>>>>>>> it in
>>>>>>> sepetated patch later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've done some patches fixing the stack allocation issue:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/c-psci-part2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These patches are ready, but I want to add a secure data section still.
>>>>>> The data section will be for variables such as target PC, core/cluster
>>>>>> power status, context ID, etc.. IMHO this is better than putting stuff
>>>>>> at the top or bottom of the stack, and can also be referenced directly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Chenyu,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you have been working on PSCI for ARMv7. Can you review Hongbo's
>>>>> patch set and give your comment or ack?
>>>>>
>>>>> York
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thank Chenyu for valuable review comments, thank you York.
>>>> Will send another version soon.
>

Hongbo,

Where are we on this thread? Do you have an update?

York