[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for down-training issue"

york sun york.sun at nxp.com
Wed Jul 20 00:04:51 CEST 2016


On 04/20/2016 06:12 PM, York Sun wrote:
> +Roy to comment on iNIC.
>
> On 04/20/2016 06:05 PM, Qiang Zhao wrote:
>> On 04/21/2016 12:58 AM, York Sun wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: York Sun [mailto:york.sun at nxp.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:58 AM
>>> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao at nxp.com>
>>> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for
>>> down-training issue"
>>>
>>> On 04/11/2016 02:02 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit 5066e62847bddf6030262ade2aa3e7bcdc930037.
>>>>
>>>> The reverted patch will block t2080RDB iNiC, it was a workaround for
>>>> T2080QDS down-training issue, we need to revert it and find the root
>>>> cause for T2080QDS down-training issue.
>>>
>>> You have a bad wrap-back in commit message.
>>>
>>> Does the workaround block anything? Can you revert it after figuring out the
>>> root cause?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it blocks t2080RDB and c29x when using them as iNIC.
>> If revert it after figuring out the root cause, how about iNIC?
>> And I am afraid of it is a hard way to find the root cause.
>>
>
> Qiang,
>
> You delete the code gated by CONFIG_FSL_PCIE_RESET, and the macro for T208xQDS.
> How does that affect T2080RDB or C29x?
>

Qiang,

Do you have an update? If not, I will defer this patch.

York


More information about the U-Boot mailing list