[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for down-training issue"

[Qiang Zhao]

On 07/20/2016 06:05 PM, York Sun wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: york sun
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:05 AM
> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao at nxp.com>
> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Roy Zang
> <roy.zang at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for
> down-training issue"
> 
> On 04/20/2016 06:12 PM, York Sun wrote:
> > +Roy to comment on iNIC.
> >
> > On 04/20/2016 06:05 PM, Qiang Zhao wrote:
> >> On 04/21/2016 12:58 AM, York Sun wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: York Sun [mailto:york.sun at nxp.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:58 AM
> >>> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao at nxp.com>
> >>> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on
> >>> T2080QDS for down-training issue"
> >>>
> >>> On 04/11/2016 02:02 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
> >>>> This reverts commit 5066e62847bddf6030262ade2aa3e7bcdc930037.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reverted patch will block t2080RDB iNiC, it was a workaround
> >>>> for T2080QDS down-training issue, we need to revert it and find the
> >>>> root cause for T2080QDS down-training issue.
> >>>
> >>> You have a bad wrap-back in commit message.
> >>>
> >>> Does the workaround block anything? Can you revert it after figuring
> >>> out the root cause?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, it blocks t2080RDB and c29x when using them as iNIC.
> >> If revert it after figuring out the root cause, how about iNIC?
> >> And I am afraid of it is a hard way to find the root cause.
> >>
> >
> > Qiang,
> >
> > You delete the code gated by CONFIG_FSL_PCIE_RESET, and the macro for
> T208xQDS.
> > How does that affect T2080RDB or C29x?
> >
> 
> Qiang,
> 
> Do you have an update? If not, I will defer this patch.
> 

There is no any update.

-Zhao Qiang