[U-Boot] [PATCH] test/py: vboot can be run only at Sandbox

[Michal Simek]

On 22.7.2016 15:33, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On 22 July 2016 at 01:13, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu> wrote:
>> Hi Simon and Stephen,
>>
>> On 20.7.2016 17:51, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 07/20/2016 08:19 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> +Stephen
>>>>
>>>> On 18 July 2016 at 00:49, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>> Getting this error:
>>>>> Zynq> sb load hostfs - 100
>>>>> /home/monstr/data/disk/u-boot/build-zynq_zc706/test.fit
>>>>> Unknown command 'sb' - try 'help'
>>>>>
>>>>> because sb command is present only for Sandbox
>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SANDBOX) += host.o
>>>>>
>>>>> that's why mark this test to be run only at Sandbox
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>   test/py/tests/test_vboot.py | 1 +
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py b/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py
>>>>> index c77989591c7e..92b4eccad808 100644
>>>>> --- a/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py
>>>>> +++ b/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py
>>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import pytest
>>>>>   import sys
>>>>>   import u_boot_utils as util
>>>>>
>>>>> + at pytest.mark.boardspec('sandbox')
>>>>>   @pytest.mark.buildconfigspec('fit_signature')
>>>>
>>>> Can we have both conditions, or does it only work as an OR?
>>>
>>> I believe marks are conditions that must be individually satisfied, so
>>> when there are multiple marks, it's treated like an AND, which I imagine
>>> is the desired thing here.
>>>
>>
>> ACK then?
> 
> Can you add both conditions?

Sorry I don't get it. Origin there is condition that fit_signature needs
to be enabled. And this patch adds one more when sandbox is enabled.

It means vboot test runs on sandbox when fit_signature is enabled.

Thanks,
Michal