[U-Boot] [PATCH 07/14] mmc: Tinification of the mmc code
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Wed Nov 30 02:28:58 CET 2016
On 11/30/2016 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 25 November 2016 at 15:32, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> Add new configuration option CONFIG_MMC_TINY which strips away all
>> memory allocation within the MMC code and code for handling multiple
>> cards. This allows extremely space-constrained SPL code use the MMC
>> framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> ---
>> V2: Switch the MMC_TINY option to Kconfig
>> ---
>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 6 +++++-
>> drivers/mmc/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/mmc.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>
> nit below.
>
> I assume this does not use DM?
Nope, DM does not fit into those 14 kiB I have for SPL, no way.
>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> index 43c1030..3cad998 100644
>> --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> @@ -306,7 +306,11 @@ static int spl_mmc_load_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image,
>> if (part == 7)
>> part = 0;
>>
>> - err = blk_dselect_hwpart(mmc_get_blk_desc(mmc), part);
>> + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MMC_TINY))
>> + err = mmc_switch_part(mmc, part);
>> + else
>> + err = blk_dselect_hwpart(mmc_get_blk_desc(mmc), part);
>> +
>> if (err) {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>> puts("spl: mmc partition switch failed\n");
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>> index 24f4b28..aca438b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>> @@ -26,6 +26,22 @@ config DM_MMC_OPS
>> option will be removed as soon as all DM_MMC drivers use it, as it
>> will the only supported behaviour.
>>
>> +config SPL_MMC_TINY
>> + bool "Tiny MMC framework in SPL"
>> + default n
>
> Not needed?
Why not ? This makes the tinification configurable and is used on the
CI20 (JZ4780 horrorchip).
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list