[U-Boot] [PATCH 07/14] mmc: Tinification of the mmc code
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Nov 30 03:26:55 CET 2016
Hi Marek,
On 29 November 2016 at 18:28, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 01:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 25 November 2016 at 15:32, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>> Add new configuration option CONFIG_MMC_TINY which strips away all
>>> memory allocation within the MMC code and code for handling multiple
>>> cards. This allows extremely space-constrained SPL code use the MMC
>>> framework.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> V2: Switch the MMC_TINY option to Kconfig
>>> ---
>>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 6 +++++-
>>> drivers/mmc/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/mmc.h | 1 +
>>> 5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>> nit below.
>>
>> I assume this does not use DM?
>
> Nope, DM does not fit into those 14 kiB I have for SPL, no way.
>
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>> index 43c1030..3cad998 100644
>>> --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>> @@ -306,7 +306,11 @@ static int spl_mmc_load_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image,
>>> if (part == 7)
>>> part = 0;
>>>
>>> - err = blk_dselect_hwpart(mmc_get_blk_desc(mmc), part);
>>> + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MMC_TINY))
>>> + err = mmc_switch_part(mmc, part);
>>> + else
>>> + err = blk_dselect_hwpart(mmc_get_blk_desc(mmc), part);
>>> +
>>> if (err) {
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>> puts("spl: mmc partition switch failed\n");
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>>> index 24f4b28..aca438b8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,22 @@ config DM_MMC_OPS
>>> option will be removed as soon as all DM_MMC drivers use it, as it
>>> will the only supported behaviour.
>>>
>>> +config SPL_MMC_TINY
>>> + bool "Tiny MMC framework in SPL"
>>> + default n
>>
>> Not needed?
>
> Why not ? This makes the tinification configurable and is used on the
> CI20 (JZ4780 horrorchip).
Well it should default to n anyway so I don't think you need that line.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list