[U-Boot] arm socfpga: Revert "spi: cadence_qspi_apb: Support 32 bit AHB address"

Vignesh R vigneshr at ti.com
Mon Dec 4 17:13:25 UTC 2017



On 04-Dec-17 10:31 PM, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04-Dec-17 6:41 PM, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
>>> Since your commit broke my platform to fix yours, shouldn't it be
>>> reverted and TI platforms use your pending patch queue?
>>>
>>
>> Socfpga DT defined ahb base as 0xffa00000 while masked upper bits in the
>> code, which was confusing. And seems that my patch did work on some
>> socfgpa board looking at the original commit message.
> 
> There is nothing in the original commit message that suggests it
> worked on any socfpga board, unless you mean
> 
> "Since AHB address is passed from DT
>    and read as u32 value, it anyway does not make sense to mask upper bits."
> 
> which is simply wrong.
> 

There is a "Tested-by:" tag in the commit as well as:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/609955/

>> If the patch is reverted then, applying pending patches alone will not
>> help because my patch would be needed anyway to make sure we don't mask
>> 31-20 bits on TI platforms.
> 
> No it won't needed, see http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838592/ that
> patch series writes plat->trigger_address instead of ahbbase (masked
> or not).
> 

Okay, but reverting this patch would mean Jason has to rebase above
patch. Instead applying that patch would anyway fix the issue.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list