[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 3/6] arm: socfpga: Enable FPGA driver on SPL

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Mon Jun 5 12:15:33 UTC 2017


On 06/05/2017 02:11 PM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Isn, 2017-06-05 at 14:08 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/05/2017 02:06 PM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Isn, 2017-06-05 at 13:24 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/05/2017 06:02 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Isn, 2017-06-05 at 11:32 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sab, 2017-06-03 at 13:27 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/29/2017 06:00 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch is for enabling the FPGA driver support on
>>>>>>>> SPL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  include/configs/socfpga_common.h | 1 +
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
>>>>>>>> b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
>>>>>>>> index da7e4ad..e74e7eb 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
>>>>>>>>  #define CONFIG_FPGA
>>>>>>>>  #define CONFIG_FPGA_ALTERA
>>>>>>>>  #define CONFIG_FPGA_SOCFPGA
>>>>>>>> +#define CONFIG_SPL_FPGA_SUPPORT
>>>>>>> This should be Kconfig symbol selected in board config. Why
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> Kconfig symbol ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahha....ijust recalled there is a very important reason i did
>>>>> this
>>>>> because CONFIG_CMD_FPGA which is wrapping all these FPGA
>>>>> related
>>>>> CONFIG
>>>>> is not part of kconfig.
>>>> it is, so this is nonsense, try git grep next time ...
>>>> cmd/Kconfig:config CMD_FPGA
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> During the build, kconfig and Macro #define are
>>>>> in two different phase/order, so we might having build issue
>>>>> during
>>>>> kconfig build(1st phase) when some Macro #define which is 2nd
>>>>> phase
>>>>> are
>>>>> required.
>>>> I don't understand this, but I think this is bogus.
>>>>
>>> Okay. For example, CONFIG_A in Kconfig depend on CONFIG_B which is
>>> defined in socfpga_common.h. When SPL build, CONFIG_A would not be
>>> set
>>> to one even CONFIG_B is defined to one in header file, because at
>>> that
>>> moment build, CONFIG_B is not detected, but header file only get
>>> build
>>> after Kconfig build done.
>> Then convert whatever is missing to Kconfig and it's done ?
>>
> Yeah, i will send out immediately after this patch set.
> 
Please do things in sensible order ...

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list