[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tegra: don't use CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE when no SPL

Stephen Warren swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Wed Jan 3 22:44:17 UTC 2018


On 01/03/2018 03:43 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 8:14 PM
> To: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
> Cc: Tom Warren <TWarren at nvidia.com>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tegra: don't use CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE when no SPL
> 
> On 19 December 2017 at 18:30, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>>
>> 64-bit Tegra don't use SPL, and soon won't define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
>> when building. Fix the binman .dts file so that it doesn't use
>> undefined values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/dts/tegra-u-boot.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> 
> I've applied this series to u-boot-tegra/master.  I'll wait a bit to see how your new series (RAM bank/mem parsing) is received and then I'll apply it, too, and post a PR.
> I assume you expect the Linux kernel image header patches to go in thru TomR?

I think it's best to push them all through the Tegra path, since there 
will be a stream of common and Tegra patches all intermixed.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list