[U-Boot] QSPI "sf probe ...", "sf read ..." on Altera SoC FPGA

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Fri Jan 5 21:17:36 UTC 2018


On 01/05/2018 08:31 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> On Fri, 05/01/2018 Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 01/05/2018 04:49 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>>>> OK, so I need these patches to get qspi work on socfpga:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Series "spi: cadence_spi: Adopt Linux DT bindings" (v4) from Jason Rush:
>>>>>   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=13864
>>>>> - Patch "Revert "spi: cadence_qspi_apb: Use 32 bit indirect read transaction when possible" (v2)
>>>>>   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838871/
>>>>
>>>> I've waited for ack/tested-by from marek or someone who usually worked
>>>> on these cadence.
>>>
>>> Vignesh acked, who already did some of the last changes. But Ok, I've
>>> added Marek to the loop.
>>>
>>> Marek, do you see any problems here? Are you running QSPI on the
>>> socfpga platform anywhere?
>> I am not entirely sure what this partial thread is all about, do you
>> need some patches Acked ? Repost them including the Acks collected
>> already and CC me, I want to review them. PW link is not enough.
> 
> Marek, you were one of the people addressed in "to:" when Jason Rush
> sent "[PATCH v4 1/5] spi: cadence_spi: Sync DT bindings with Linux"
> and successors on Nov. 16th 2017.
> 
> You were also in the "to:" field when I sent "[PATCH v4 1/5] spi:
> cadence_spi: Sync DT bindings with Linux" on Nov. 17th 2017.
> 
> Should I resend them anyway?

I really dunno what to make of this sparse thread, sorry. Also, I don't
quite remember what happened in this thread on November 17th, sorry.

So maybe you should elaborate what you expect me to do ... or just
resend the patches, yes.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list