[PATCH v5 7/7] doc: boards: Add rockchip documentation

Jagan Teki jagan at amarulasolutions.com
Mon Dec 30 09:59:31 CET 2019


Hi,

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:11 PM Matwey V. Kornilov
<matwey.kornilov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the patch set.
> Currently, I have the following concern about documentation and
> overall proposed u-boot deploy procedure.
>
> There is a use case, when I have to use Rockchip proprietary TPL
> binary and deploy it instead of u-boot's one together with u-boot SPL
> and ITB images.
> It is required for debugging purposes because unfortunately u-boot TPL
> is usually less stable that proprietary one. And switching the TPL
> binary is basically the first step when I see random strange crashes.
> It is a good way to locate an issue origin.
>
> Could we somehow ensure that this backup deployment plan is still
> possible and documented in the text here? It would be great if the
> user could learn the procedure from the text, not from the source
> code, recovering correct offsets.

You mean to say rkbin => SPL => U-Boot proper ? if yes, I do agree
with this point and it is worth to document it as well. Kever, will
that be okay for you?

Jagan.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list