[PATCH v5 7/7] doc: boards: Add rockchip documentation
Matwey V. Kornilov
matwey.kornilov at gmail.com
Tue Dec 31 08:50:42 CET 2019
пн, 30 дек. 2019 г. в 11:59, Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:11 PM Matwey V. Kornilov
> <matwey.kornilov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch set.
> > Currently, I have the following concern about documentation and
> > overall proposed u-boot deploy procedure.
> >
> > There is a use case, when I have to use Rockchip proprietary TPL
> > binary and deploy it instead of u-boot's one together with u-boot SPL
> > and ITB images.
> > It is required for debugging purposes because unfortunately u-boot TPL
> > is usually less stable that proprietary one. And switching the TPL
> > binary is basically the first step when I see random strange crashes.
> > It is a good way to locate an issue origin.
> >
> > Could we somehow ensure that this backup deployment plan is still
> > possible and documented in the text here? It would be great if the
> > user could learn the procedure from the text, not from the source
> > code, recovering correct offsets.
>
> You mean to say rkbin => SPL => U-Boot proper ? if yes, I do agree
Yes, I mean so.
I think it would be great to have something like the section
describing where do the things came from and the layout which is under
the hood.
> with this point and it is worth to document it as well. Kever, will
> that be okay for you?
>
> Jagan.
--
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list