[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/20] mx6sabre: Add DM and SPL FIT support

[Abel Vesa]

On 19-02-01 15:13:32, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Abel,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > The third version is here:
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019-January%2F356903.html&data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7Cc7db2be273394c06098308d688689e41%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636846380248922351&sdata=fhDqNxkE1dq0fGNroGRR%2F0OkmBPRlVBqCefS6GM8kns%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying
> > to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my
> > excuse, that was working even with the spl_image->os set to 0,
> > bug which I (hope) I fixed in the first patch (a new one)
> > of this series.
> 
> Thanks for your work on this!
> 
> Just to confirm: with this series all sabresd variants (imx6q, imx6dl,
> imx6qp) boot with the same binary, right?
> 

That is correct.

For mx6sabresd_defconfig, all imx6q_sabresd, imx6qp_sabresd and imx6dl_sabresd
have been tested with the same binary.

And I've tested exactly the same the mx6sabreauto_defconfig with all three SoC
combinations.

> Is there anything known to be not working that used to work before due
> to missing driver model conversion?
> 

I don't know about anything that might not work. As specified in the cover
letter I had to get rid (disable) of EFI, EXT and DOS support in SPL.

> Is Ethernet functional?

I haven't tested the ethernet on all of them, just one of each (sabresd/sabreauto).

I'll test them all when I get back at the office tomorrow.

> 
> Thanks