[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 6/8] spl : socfpga: Implement fpga bitstream loading with socfpga loadfs

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Thu Feb 14 10:42:42 UTC 2019


On 2/14/19 7:50 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 17:25 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 2/13/19 3:18 PM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for loading FPGA bitstream to get DDR up running before
>>> U-Boot is loaded into DDR. Boot device initialization, generic
>>> firmware
>>> loader and SPL FAT support are required for this whole mechanism to
>>> work.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> changes for v7
>>> - Removed casting for get_fpga_filename
>>> - Removed hard coding DDR address for loading core bistream, using
>>> loadable
>>>   property from FIT.
>>> - Added checking for config_pins, return if error.
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c | 41
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c b/arch/arm/mach-
>>> socfpga/spl_a10.c
>>> index c97eacb..36003b1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_a10.c
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>>  /*
>>> - *  Copyright (C) 2012 Altera Corporation <www.altera.com>
>>> + *  Copyright (C) 2012-2019 Altera Corporation <www.altera.com>
>>>   */
>>>  
>>>  #include <common.h>
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>>>  #include <fdtdec.h>
>>>  #include <watchdog.h>
>>>  #include <asm/arch/pinmux.h>
>>> +#include <asm/arch/fpga_manager.h>
>>> +#include <mmc.h>
>>>  
>>>  DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>  
>>> @@ -68,11 +70,48 @@ u32 spl_boot_mode(const u32 boot_device)
>>>  
>>>  void spl_board_init(void)
>>>  {
>>> +	char buf[16 * 1024] __aligned(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN);
>> ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER()
> #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN	CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE
> They are not same thing?

See include/memalign.h and other drivers, the macro is preferred as it
hides the details.

>>>
>>> +
>>>  	/* enable console uart printing */
>>>  	preloader_console_init();
>>>  	WATCHDOG_RESET();
>>>  
>>>  	arch_early_init_r();
>>> +
>>> +	/* If the full FPGA is already loaded, ie.from EPCQ,
>>> config fpga pins */
>>> +	if (is_fpgamgr_user_mode()) {
>>> +		int ret = config_pins(gd->fdt_blob, "shared");
>>> +
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			return;
>>> +
>>> +		ret = config_pins(gd->fdt_blob, "fpga");
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			return;
>>> +	} else if (!is_fpgamgr_early_user_mode()) {
>>> +		/* Program IOSSM(early IO release) or full FPGA */
>>> +		fpga_fs_info fpga_fsinfo;
>>> +		int len;
>>> +
>>> +		fpga_fsinfo.filename = get_fpga_filename(gd-
>>>> fdt_blob, &len);
>>> +
>>> +		if (fpga_fsinfo.filename)
>>> +			socfpga_loadfs(&fpga_fsinfo, buf,
>>> sizeof(buf), 0);
>> Why is this code here twice ? The same code seems to be below ...
> The 1st calling for periph program, then running ddr calibration, then
> 2nd calling for core program.

Then maybe the code can be deduplicated ?

>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	/* If the IOSSM/full FPGA is already loaded, start DDR */
>>> +	if (is_fpgamgr_early_user_mode() ||
>>> is_fpgamgr_user_mode())
>>> +		ddr_calibration_sequence();
>>> +
>>> +	if (!is_fpgamgr_user_mode()) {
>>> +		fpga_fs_info fpga_fsinfo;
>>> +		int len;
>>> +
>>> +		fpga_fsinfo.filename = get_fpga_filename(gd-
>>>> fdt_blob, &len);
>>> +
>>> +		if (fpga_fsinfo.filename)
>>> +			socfpga_loadfs(&fpga_fsinfo, buf,
>>> sizeof(buf), 0);
>>> +	}
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
>>>


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list