[U-Boot] Question regarding SWUpdate ..... from command line

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Stefano,

> Hallo Lukasz,
> 
> On 27/02/19 10:13, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefano.
> >   
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> I have the use case and a tbot testcase. But we are now at EW,
> >> please wait until I am back.  
> > 
> > Ach.... I've just realised this :-)
> > Have a nice time there :-)
> >   
> 
> We are back, but I think today I just answer to mails...

I hope that you (all) enjoyed EW ;-)

> 
> I have added our tbot experts to the list because we have discussed
> some topics at EW.

I've also shared some thoughts/feedback with Harald regarding tbot.

> 
> >>
> >> Stefano
> >>
> >> On 25/02/19 23:57, Lukasz Majewski wrote:  
> >>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:03:48 +0100
> >>> Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>> Dear Stefano,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm wondering if there is any way to emulate SWUpdate http
> >>>> frontend from command line (to send *.swu images via command
> >>>> line)?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm looking for a solution to automatically flash debug images on
> >>>> the target (and no interaction with browser is necessary).
> >>>>
> >>>> Have you had previously any such use case?    
> >>>
> >>> The exact use case is to:
> >>>
> >>> - Re-build production images with
> >>>   EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES="empty-root-password"
> >>>
> >>> - Force the board to SWUpdate (this is done from production
> >>> on-board SW)
> >>>
> >>> - Use some scripts to send *.swu images and prepare that board for
> >>>   testing.
> >>>
> >>> Some curl magic like:
> >>>
> >>> curl -v --insecure --request POST --data-binary
> >>> "@swu-image-emmc-backup-display5.swu" http://192.168.2.130:8080
> >>>
> >>> Is not (yet) working properly - but some page info is displayed.
> >>>     
> 
> I have written a tbot testcase that I have already used on a couple of
> board and it covers an update using the internal Webserver (your case,
> in fact). I have also dome other case in my list, ant last but not
> least, also a tc working with Hawkbit is in my list (I have to refresh
> my Java knowledge..). We discussed also how to share this - we agree
> that tc should be shared, not yet clear how.

Ok. Good :-)

> 
> In the meantime, I can propose I will push a public repo with just tc
> (no boards, no labs at all) and we can use it as container for tc we
> currently have. tc could be picked up later from this container andwe
> could also dropped this repo in future after replacing with something
> better. Any thought (pro or contra) ?

Yes, I think that it is a good idea.

> 
> Best regards,
> Stefano
> 
> 




Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190301/97e2ccf8/attachment.sig>