[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: socfpga: make SPL_TEXT_BASE overridable

[Simon Goldschmidt]

On 16.03.19 13:50, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/16/19 1:36 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 16, 2019, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de
>> <mailto:marex at denx.de>> wrote:
>>
>>      On 3/16/19 9:23 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>      > Am 15.03.2019 um 22:20 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>      >> On 3/15/19 8:44 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>      >>> To boot from fpga on socfpga gen5, we need to set
>>      >>> CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE to
>>      >>> 0xC0000000 (hps2fpgaslaves base address).
>>      >>>
>>      >>> Since converting CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE to Kconfig hasn't been
>>      >>> successful so
>>      >>> far, let's make this value overridable in socfpga_common.h, so that
>>      >>> we can
>>      >>> have different board configs override this in socfpga_common.h.
>>      >>>
>>      >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt
>>      <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com
>>      <mailto:simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>>
>>      >>
>>      >> Is this a fix for current release or new feature for next ?
>>      >
>>      > Yes, it's a fix for the current release. It's the only thing
>>      missing to
>>      > *finally* get mainline SPL booting from FPGA (on socfpga gen5).
>>      >
>>      > As written in the log, the original plan was to move
>>      > CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE to Kconfig completely, but that didn't work out
>>      > (still), which is why we have to do it in a different way.
>>      >
>>      > I could provide a new board config to boot from FPGA if you want, but
>>      > that did not make much sense to me as the FPGA image would be
>>      missing...
>>
>>      Well, applied.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>   
>>
>>
>>      That said, do you plan to work on the Kconfig conversion further ?
>>      What's the problem there ?
>>
>>
>> I started that conversion (still in patchwork) but Tom said it produced
>> errors
>> and he kind of took it further. I'm not really on track what's still
>> missing.
>>
>> But of course I would still prefer the Kconfig version instead of this
>> #ifndef...
> 
> Always :)
> 

What's the status here, Tom? Anything I can do? Should I try again now 
with my original approach of just using moveconfig.py?

Regards,
Simon