[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12 v2] Makefile: Add Kconfig option CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to select the SPL binary

Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com
Fri Mar 29 10:04:16 UTC 2019



On 26.03.2019 14:16, Stefan Roese wrote:

> 
> This patch adds the CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE option to select the SPL image that
> shall be used to generate the combined SPL + U-Boot image. The default
> value is the current value "spl/u-boot-spl.bin". >
> This patch also sets CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to "spl/boot.bin" for AT91 targets
> which use SPL NAND support (boot from NAND).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
> Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas at biessmann.org>
> Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - No change
> 
>   Kconfig  | 10 ++++++++++
>   Makefile |  4 +++-
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
> index 305b265ed7..7c2b86f1f3 100644
> --- a/Kconfig
> +++ b/Kconfig
> @@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ config BUILD_ROM
>   	  which are not shipped in the U-Boot source tree.
>   	  Please, see doc/README.x86 for details.
>   
> +config SPL_IMAGE
> +	string "SPL image filename that is generated"
> +	default "spl/boot.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> +	default "spl/u-boot-spl.bin"

Hi Stefan,

This means that the old spl/u-boot-spl.bin is gone for AT91 and NAND ?
Please correct me if I am wrong

> +	help
> +	  The SPL image filename that is generated by the build process.
> +	  This image might be used to generated a combined image with
> +	  SPL and main U-Boot proper as well.
> +
>   config BUILD_TARGET
>   	string "Build target special images"
>   	default "u-boot-with-spl.sfp" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
> @@ -232,6 +241,7 @@ config BUILD_TARGET
>   	default "u-boot-elf.srec" if RCAR_GEN3
>   	default "u-boot.itb" if SPL_LOAD_FIT && ARCH_SUNXI
>   	default "u-boot.kwb" if KIRKWOOD
> +	default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT


This means that before this patch, there was no special target for AT91 
? Thus no special image was built ? And after this patch, there will 
also be a new binary u-boot-with-spl.bin, except spl/boot.bin and 
spl/u-boot-spl.bin ?
Thus your patch does a bit more than what it's explained in the commit 
message ?

Thanks,
Eugen


>   	help
>   	  Some SoCs need special image types (e.g. U-Boot binary
>   	  with a special header) as build targets. By defining
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index c1af9307b3..077bb6634e 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1225,9 +1225,11 @@ else
>   SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot.bin
>   endif
>   
> +SPL_IMAGE := $(CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE:"%"=%)
> +
>   OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot-with-spl.bin = -I binary -O binary \
>   				   --pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO)
> -u-boot-with-spl.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin $(SPL_PAYLOAD) FORCE
> +u-boot-with-spl.bin: $(SPL_IMAGE) $(SPL_PAYLOAD) FORCE
>   	$(call if_changed,pad_cat)
>   
>   ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX)$(CONFIG_SPL),yy)
> 


More information about the U-Boot mailing list