[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12 v2] Makefile: Add Kconfig option CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to select the SPL binary
Stefan Roese
sr at denx.de
Fri Mar 29 15:53:26 UTC 2019
On 29.03.19 11:04, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
>
>
> On 26.03.2019 14:16, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
>>
>> This patch adds the CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE option to select the SPL image that
>> shall be used to generate the combined SPL + U-Boot image. The default
>> value is the current value "spl/u-boot-spl.bin". >
>> This patch also sets CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to "spl/boot.bin" for AT91 targets
>> which use SPL NAND support (boot from NAND).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>> Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas at biessmann.org>
>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - No change
>>
>> Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
>> Makefile | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
>> index 305b265ed7..7c2b86f1f3 100644
>> --- a/Kconfig
>> +++ b/Kconfig
>> @@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ config BUILD_ROM
>> which are not shipped in the U-Boot source tree.
>> Please, see doc/README.x86 for details.
>>
>> +config SPL_IMAGE
>> + string "SPL image filename that is generated"
>> + default "spl/boot.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
>> + default "spl/u-boot-spl.bin"
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> This means that the old spl/u-boot-spl.bin is gone for AT91 and NAND ?
> Please correct me if I am wrong
No, its still there.
>> + help
>> + The SPL image filename that is generated by the build process.
>> + This image might be used to generated a combined image with
>> + SPL and main U-Boot proper as well.
>> +
>> config BUILD_TARGET
>> string "Build target special images"
>> default "u-boot-with-spl.sfp" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
>> @@ -232,6 +241,7 @@ config BUILD_TARGET
>> default "u-boot-elf.srec" if RCAR_GEN3
>> default "u-boot.itb" if SPL_LOAD_FIT && ARCH_SUNXI
>> default "u-boot.kwb" if KIRKWOOD
>> + default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
>
>
> This means that before this patch, there was no special target for AT91
> ?
Yes.
> Thus no special image was built ?
Yes.
> And after this patch, there will
> also be a new binary u-boot-with-spl.bin, except spl/boot.bin and
> spl/u-boot-spl.bin ?
The old binaries are still generated. Only a new combined image is
generated too.
> Thus your patch does a bit more than what it's explained in the commit
> message ?
Does it? What exactly is missing in the commit message? Please explain
and I'll add something in the next patch version.
Thanks,
Stefan
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list