[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] spi: cadence_qspi: support DM_CLK
Simon Goldschmidt
simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 19:49:51 UTC 2019
Marek,
Am 12.11.2019 um 12:57 schrieb Simon Goldschmidt:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:40 PM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr at ti.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/19 4:57 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:30 AM Tan, Ley Foon <ley.foon.tan at intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>> [...]
>>>>>> But, unfortunately, such stub does not exists for clk_get_rate().
>>>>>> So on platforms w/o CONFIG_CLK set:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: drivers/spi/built-in.o: in function
>>>>> `cadence_spi_probe':
>>>>>> /home/a0132425/workspace/u-boot/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.c:184:
>>>>> undefined reference to `clk_get_rate'
>>>>>> Makefile:1647: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
>>>>>> make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
>>>>>
>>>>> So why did it compile for me? Probably because the linker knows it doesn't
>>>>> need 'clk_get_rate' since this branch will never be executed?
>>>> Maybe you can try compile from clean build. Run "make mrproper" before compile.
>>>
>>> Of course I did that, and I just did it again. It *does* compile.
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell me a config/setup where it doesn't compile? Or does
>>> this complain only come from reading the sources?
>>>
>>
>> I see above error with k2g_evm_defconfig and compiler is:
>
> Ok, just tested that config and it works for me :-(
After having a successful travis run for this on top of
u-boot-socfpga/master, could you take this and re-send the PR of last week?
Travis run is here:
https://travis-ci.org/goldsimon/u-boot/builds/614187977
Regards,
Simon
>
>>
>> arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (GNU Toolchain for the A-profile Architecture
>> 8.3-2019.03 (arm-rel-8.36)) 8.3.0
>
> I'm using 6.3.0 from debian stretch, but have also tested my patch
> with newest Ubuntu (which has a 9.x cross compiler).
>
> So while I think that difference is disturbing, Maybe it's really best
> to inline-define all clock functions as you mentioned to Patrick
> in the other thread...
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Vignesh
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Ley Foon
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Vignesh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That should be enough, no? And yes, I did test this on the current
>>>>>>> state of
>>>>>>> gen5 which does not have a CLK driver, yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Ley Foon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + ret = clk_get_by_index(bus, 0, &clk);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CQSPI_REF_CLK
>>>>>>>>> + plat->ref_clk_hz = CONFIG_CQSPI_REF_CLK; #else
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>>> + plat->ref_clk_hz = clk_get_rate(&clk);
>>>>>>>>> + clk_free(&clk);
>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(plat->ref_clk_hz))
>>>>>>>>> + return plat->ref_clk_hz;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> debug("%s: regbase=%p ahbbase=%p max-frequency=%d page-
>>>>>>>>> size=%d\n",
>>>>>>>>> __func__, plat->regbase, plat->ahbbase, plat->max_hz,
>>>>>>>>> plat->page_size);
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.h
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.h index 20cceca239..99dee75bbd 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> #define CQSPI_READ_CAPTURE_MAX_DELAY 16
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> struct cadence_spi_platdata {
>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int ref_clk_hz;
>>>>>>>>> unsigned int max_hz;
>>>>>>>>> void *regbase;
>>>>>>>>> void *ahbbase;
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Vignesh
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list