[PATCH] net: dwc_eth_qos: add Kconfig option to select supported configuration

[Marek Vasut]

On 6/10/20 10:11 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
>>>>> You mean be more like barebox and Linux where the board-specific stuff
>>>>> is kicked up one level and we have a more generic binary?  I don't know
>>>>> and there's so much work that would be required before having to move
>>>>> this from a Kconfig choice to just Kconfig options I don't see that as
>>>>> being a relevant question here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or did I misunderstand the question?
>>>>
>>>> More like automatically have a Kconfig option generate it's _SPL and
>>>> _TPL variant.
>>>
>>> Ah.  Well, that is rephrasing my first question.  Would it ever make
>>> sense to have more than one of these enabled?
>>
>> For some sort of universal SPL, maybe ?
> 
> So no, there's not a reason today then and it should be a choice.

Can you provide some more detailed explanation why we shouldn't generate
_SPL and _TPL variants of Kconfig entries for all Kconfig entries ? It
would make things much simpler and permit configuring SPL/TPL the same
way U-Boot is configured, with their own set of options.