[PATCH] net: dwc_eth_qos: add Kconfig option to select supported configuration

[Marek Vasut]

On 6/10/20 10:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 6/10/20 10:11 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>>> You mean be more like barebox and Linux where the board-specific stuff
>>>>>>> is kicked up one level and we have a more generic binary?  I don't know
>>>>>>> and there's so much work that would be required before having to move
>>>>>>> this from a Kconfig choice to just Kconfig options I don't see that as
>>>>>>> being a relevant question here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or did I misunderstand the question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More like automatically have a Kconfig option generate it's _SPL and
>>>>>> _TPL variant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah.  Well, that is rephrasing my first question.  Would it ever make
>>>>> sense to have more than one of these enabled?
>>>>
>>>> For some sort of universal SPL, maybe ?
>>>
>>> So no, there's not a reason today then and it should be a choice.
>>
>> Can you provide some more detailed explanation why we shouldn't generate
>> _SPL and _TPL variants of Kconfig entries for all Kconfig entries ? It
>> would make things much simpler and permit configuring SPL/TPL the same
>> way U-Boot is configured, with their own set of options.
> 
> In the context of this particular thread?  I don't see how it's helpful
> to say 3 times that we're in fact building for Tegra or STM32 or SoCFPGA
> when you can't build something that runs on more than one of those.

In general.

Here I can imagine it is possible to build SoCFPGA+STM32 universal SD
card image in fact.