[PATCH v2 11/17] efi_loader: add firmware management protocol for FIT image
Sughosh Ganu
sughosh.ganu at linaro.org
Mon Jun 22 09:58:07 CEST 2020
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 06:39, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:19:17AM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 08:26, AKASHI Takahiro <
> takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In this commit, a very simple firmware management protocol driver
> > > is implemented. It will take a common FIT image firmware in a capsule
> > > file and apply the data using dfu backend storage drivers via
> > > update_fit() interface.
> > >
> > > So "dfu_alt_info" variable should be properly set to specify a device
> > > and location to be updated. Please read README.dfu.
> > >
> > > Fit image is a common file format for firmware update on U-Boot, and
> > > this protocol works neatly just as a wrapper for one.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/efi_api.h | 4 +
> > > include/efi_loader.h | 2 +
> > > lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 11 ++
> > > lib/efi_loader/Makefile | 1 +
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c | 12 +-
> > > lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 6 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100644 lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h
> > > index b062720e8220..c3fc4edbedc4 100644
> > > --- a/include/efi_api.h
> > > +++ b/include/efi_api.h
> > > @@ -1843,6 +1843,10 @@ struct efi_signature_list {
> > > EFI_GUID(0x86c77a67, 0x0b97, 0x4633, 0xa1, 0x87, \
> > > 0x49, 0x10, 0x4d, 0x06, 0x85, 0xc7)
> > >
> > > +#define EFI_FIRMWARE_IMAGE_TYPE_UBOOT_FIT_GUID \
> > > + EFI_GUID(0xae13ff2d, 0x9ad4, 0x4e25, 0x9a, 0xc8, \
> > > + 0x6d, 0x80, 0xb3, 0xb2, 0x21, 0x47)
> > > +
> > > #define EFI_IMAGE_ATTRIBUTE_IMAGE_UPDATABLE 0x1
> > > #define EFI_IMAGE_ATTRIBUTE_RESET_REQUIRED 0x2
> > > #define EFI_IMAGE_ATTRIBUTE_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED 0x4
> > > diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
> > > index bc58c7e3c1d7..5f574533e732 100644
> > > --- a/include/efi_loader.h
> > > +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
> > > @@ -787,6 +787,8 @@ bool efi_secure_boot_enabled(void);
> > > bool efi_image_parse(void *efi, size_t len, struct efi_image_regions
> > > **regp,
> > > WIN_CERTIFICATE **auth, size_t *auth_len);
> > >
> > > +extern const struct efi_firmware_management_protocol efi_fmp_fit;
> > > +
> > > /* Capsule update */
> > > efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_update_capsule(
> > > struct efi_capsule_header **capsule_header_array,
> > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > index e1413c35e33c..305751f4b15c 100644
> > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > > @@ -86,6 +86,17 @@ config EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT
> > > Select this option if you want to enable capsule-based
> > > firmware update using Firmware Management Protocol.
> > >
> > > +config EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_FIT
> > > + bool "FMP driver for FIT image"
> > > + depends on EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT
> > > + depends on FIT
> > > + select UPDATE_FIT
> > > + select DFU
> > > + default n
> > > + help
> > > + Select this option if you want to enable firmware management
> > > protocol
> > > + driver for FIT image
> > > +
> > > config EFI_DEVICE_PATH_TO_TEXT
> > > bool "Device path to text protocol"
> > > default y
> > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> > > index 67bc5c9c0907..ea1fbc4a9deb 100644
> > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO) += helloworld_efi.o
> > > obj-y += efi_bootmgr.o
> > > obj-y += efi_boottime.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_HAVE_CAPSULE_SUPPORT) += efi_capsule.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_FIT) += efi_firmware.o
> > >
> >
> > Why can we not build this file based on
> > CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT. That way, we do not have to
> declare
> > the CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE symbol on which this file is being built
> in
> > a subsequent patch.
>
> That is because, in some cases, efi_firmware.c won't be compiled in
> as a specific platform may want to have its own protocol.
>
I think the whole point of the review comments from Heinrich to my fmp
implementation for qemu arm64 platform was to have a common fmp
implementation that could be used on all platforms and architectures. Do
you see a case for introducing a platform specific implementation now that
we have support for a generic raw binary image. Any platform specific fixup
if required, can be handled by adding pre-processing/post-processing
functions.
-sughosh
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list