[PATCH v3 1/1] phy: add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller

[Rayagonda Kokatanur]

Hi Tom,


On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:46 PM Rayagonda Kokatanur
<rayagonda.kokatanur at broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:08:12PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
> >
> > > From: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam at broadcom.com>
> > >
> > > Add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller driver.
> > > This driver supports maximum 8 PAXB phys using pipemux data.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam at broadcom.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur at broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
> > > ---
> > > Changes from v2:
> > >  -Address review comments from Stefan Roese,
> > >   Rearrange the include files.
> > >   Remove dm/device.h as its included part of dm.h.
> > >
> > > Changes from v1:
> > >  -Address review comments from Stefan Roese,
> > >   Use GENMASK() instead of hard code value.
> > >   Remove unwanted struct declaration.
> > >   Get pr_err() into single line.
> > >
> > >  drivers/phy/Kconfig           |   7 ++
> > >  drivers/phy/Makefile          |   1 +
> > >  drivers/phy/phy-bcm-sr-pcie.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > The patch itself is fine but I think shows another problem.  Can you
> > please add a patch that lists something relevant in the top-level
> > MAINTAINERS file and list this and all of the other drivers, etc, that
> > wouldn't just be listed in the board MAINATINERS file?  Thanks!

I have a plan to update the top level MAINTAINER file with all new
driver and board files in a separate patch.
Hope this is fine, please let me know.

Thanks,
Rayagonda

>
> I will be mainitainer going ahead.
> I have a plan to update top level MAINTAINER file once I push platform files.
> Hope this is fine.
>
> >
> > --
> > Tom