[PATCH V4 00/13] net: smc911x: Convert to DM

[Marek Vasut]

On 3/26/20 11:59 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:51 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/26/20 11:47 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:47 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Perform DM conversion of the SMC911x driver.
>>>>
>>>> Note that the DT compatible is set only for 9115 , so this might need
>>>> to be changed.
>>>>
>>>> Marek Vasut (13):
>>>>   net: smc911x: Remove pkt_data_{push,pull}
>>>>   net: smc911x: Replace malloc()+memset() with calloc()
>>>>   net: smc911x: Rename smc911x_rx() to smc911x_recv()
>>>>   net: smc911x: Invert the logic in smc911x_miiphy_{read,write}()
>>>>   net: smc911x: Fix potential memleak() in init fail path
>>>>   net: smc911x: Pull MII registration into separate function
>>>>   net: smc911x: Inline all functions from header file
>>>>   net: smc911x: Drop weak alias from 32bit accessors
>>>>   net: smc911x: Convert IO accessors to {read,write}{w,l}()
>>>>   net: smc911x: Pass around driver private data
>>>>   net: smc911x: Clean up the status handling in smc911x_recv()
>>>>   net: smc911x: Split non-DM specific bits from common code
>>>>   net: smc911x: Add DM support
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/net/Kconfig                  |   2 +
>>>>  drivers/net/smc911x.c                | 559 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>  drivers/net/smc911x.h                | 157 --------
>>>>  examples/standalone/Makefile         |   5 +-
>>>>  examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c | 150 +++++++
>>>>  5 files changed, 602 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
>>>> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
>>>
>>> For the series:
>>> Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> #omap3_logic
>>
>> Cool, thanks.
>>
>> Do you plan to convert the OMAP boards to this then ?
> 
> Once your patch has been accepted, I will convert the boards that I
> maintain.  The way you set it up shows they work using the non-DM and
> DM options.

I had to, to avoid breaking various boards.

> I have verified it on mine using both, but I don't have
> the other hardware to verify the functionality, but I'll try to CC a
> variety of omap people that I know of so they are aware.

Good, thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut