Antwort: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] dm: Add programmatic generation of ACPI tables (part B)

[Simon Glass]

Hi Andy,

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:32, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:55:49PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
>
> > > Since you were involved a lot in the discussion in the part A series,
> > > would you please let me know if you get some time to review this?
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have as much time now for review of part B as I had for
> > part A. I already started reviewing part B and I will try to continue when time
> > allows.
>
> I'm busy at the moment and I will be not available for this for few weeks.
> Code can be fixed iteratively, the most important part now is to see the big
> picture of the design and approach.
>
> Could you remind which patch in the series describes that? I will look at it
> closer and try to allocate a bit of time to do it.
>

The big picture was in part A. Part B uses the same mechanism to add
support for SSDT and DSDT generation, e.g. see [1] and [2].

Regards,
Simon

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200510203409.203520-24-sjg@chromium.org/
[2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200510143320.v2.32.I8b14735c2286701cc6be7d36b85bbad8ca58babd@changeid/