Antwort: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] dm: Add programmatic generation of ACPI tables (part B)
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Wed May 13 11:55:43 CEST 2020
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 05:22:38PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:32, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:55:49PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> > > > Since you were involved a lot in the discussion in the part A series,
> > > > would you please let me know if you get some time to review this?
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I don't have as much time now for review of part B as I had for
> > > part A. I already started reviewing part B and I will try to continue when time
> > > allows.
> > I'm busy at the moment and I will be not available for this for few weeks.
> > Code can be fixed iteratively, the most important part now is to see the big
> > picture of the design and approach.
> > Could you remind which patch in the series describes that? I will look at it
> > closer and try to allocate a bit of time to do it.
> The big picture was in part A. Part B uses the same mechanism to add
> support for SSDT and DSDT generation, e.g. see  and .
Thank you, then I think what is left are technical (implementation) details
that can be amended in the future.
With Best Regards,
More information about the U-Boot