Antwort: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] dm: Add programmatic generation of ACPI tables (part B)

[Simon Glass]

Hi,

On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 03:55, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 05:22:38PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:32, Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:55:49PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Since you were involved a lot in the discussion in the part A series,
> > > > > would you please let me know if you get some time to review this?
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, I don't have as much time now for review of part B as I had for
> > > > part A. I already started reviewing part B and I will try to continue when time
> > > > allows.
> > >
> > > I'm busy at the moment and I will be not available for this for few weeks.
> > > Code can be fixed iteratively, the most important part now is to see the big
> > > picture of the design and approach.
> > >
> > > Could you remind which patch in the series describes that? I will look at it
> > > closer and try to allocate a bit of time to do it.
> > >
> >
> > The big picture was in part A. Part B uses the same mechanism to add
> > support for SSDT and DSDT generation, e.g. see [1] and [2].
>
> Thank you, then I think what is left are technical (implementation) details
> that can be amended in the future.

OK then perhaps part B can be applied and I can send part C, which is
the actual coral implementation?

Regards,
SImon