[PATCH 1/1] rsa: fix retrieving public exponent on big-endian systems

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Mon Oct 12 13:41:07 CEST 2020


On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:04:28AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 09/10/2020 15.08, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 12:17:56AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> On 07/10/2020 00.02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>>
> >>> Is there a way to add a test for this?
> >>
> >> Not that I can think of, other than finding some BE board and hooking it
> >> up in some CI. Apparently not very many people use verified boot on BE
> >> platforms :( or at least they don't follow upstream U-Boot closely.
> > 
> > We have tests for verified boot for sandbox.  Can we not expand them to
> > run on qemu* including ppce500?
> 
> Perhaps. I didn't know sandbox was supposed to be buildable for other
> arches than x86ish. I just tried doing the naive thing,
> 
> $ export ARCH=powerpc
> $ export CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnu-
> $ make sandbox_defconfig
> $ make -j8
> include/config_distro_bootcmd.h:335:3: error: #error "sandbox EFI
> support is only supported on ARM and x86"
> 
> After trimming the .config to git rid of that, I get a million other
> warnings and errors, so that doesn't seem to be the right way.

Sorry, I meant the literal QEMU targets that we use.

> Can we please apply the patch to unbreak actual boards even if there's
> no regression test for it?

Yes, sorry it wasn't clear.  I will pick this up soon, with a bunch of
other stuff.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20201012/d1a1c679/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list