[PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen

Peng Fan (OSS) peng.fan at oss.nxp.com
Mon Aug 2 11:57:41 CEST 2021


Hi Tim,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
> 
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:17 PM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am Mi., 5. Mai 2021 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
> > <andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com>:
> > >
> > > Hello Oliver,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Oliver
> > > > Graute
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:01 PM
> > > > To: sbabic at denx.de
> > > > Cc: festevam at gmail.com; peng.fan at nxp.com;
> > > > oliver.graute at kococonnector.com; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Simon Glass
> > > > <sjg at chromium.org>; uboot-imx <uboot-imx at nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unit addresses are not allowed anymore in a FIT image since
> > > >
> > > > commit 3f04db891a35 ("image: Check for unit addresses in FITs")
> > > >
> > > > This caused this error on mkimage creation:
> > > >
> > > > ./tools/mkimage: verify_header failed for FIT Image support with
> > > > exit code 1
> > > > Makefile:1393: recipe for target 'u-boot.itb' failed
> > > > make: *** [u-boot.itb] Error 1
> >
> > This error is still present in the current master branch and the
> > target "flash.bin" does not not build anymore for the
> > imx8mq_evk_defconfig.
> >
> > Any thoughts to apply this patch to master?
> >
> 
> Heiko,
> 
> I just ran into this failure as well with imx8mm_venice_defconfig which I
> haven't moved to binman yet.
> 
> With respect to moving to binman, I'm all for it but I'm wondering why other
> boards have elected to move from a monolithic flash.bin including the SPL and
> u-boot.itb pre-binman to post-binman where flash.bin is just the SPL. I'm not
> sure why users should be hit with a change like that... why are people not
> having binman produce a flash.bin that was equivalent to pre-binman?

You mean flash.bin not contain u-boot.bin when using binman here?

Regards,
Peng.

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tim


More information about the U-Boot mailing list