[PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen

[Heiko Thiery]

Hi all,

Am Mo., 2. Aug. 2021 um 11:57 Uhr schrieb Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan at oss.nxp.com>:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:17 PM Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Am Mi., 5. Mai 2021 um 15:30 Uhr schrieb ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
> > > <andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Oliver,
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Oliver
> > > > > Graute
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:01 PM
> > > > > To: sbabic at denx.de
> > > > > Cc: festevam at gmail.com; peng.fan at nxp.com;
> > > > > oliver.graute at kococonnector.com; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Simon Glass
> > > > > <sjg at chromium.org>; uboot-imx <uboot-imx at nxp.com>
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v1] imx: mkimage_fit_atf: replace @ with hyphen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unit addresses are not allowed anymore in a FIT image since
> > > > >
> > > > > commit 3f04db891a35 ("image: Check for unit addresses in FITs")
> > > > >
> > > > > This caused this error on mkimage creation:
> > > > >
> > > > > ./tools/mkimage: verify_header failed for FIT Image support with
> > > > > exit code 1
> > > > > Makefile:1393: recipe for target 'u-boot.itb' failed
> > > > > make: *** [u-boot.itb] Error 1
> > >
> > > This error is still present in the current master branch and the
> > > target "flash.bin" does not not build anymore for the
> > > imx8mq_evk_defconfig.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts to apply this patch to master?
> > >
> >
> > Heiko,
> >
> > I just ran into this failure as well with imx8mm_venice_defconfig which I
> > haven't moved to binman yet.
> >
> > With respect to moving to binman, I'm all for it but I'm wondering why other
> > boards have elected to move from a monolithic flash.bin including the SPL and
> > u-boot.itb pre-binman to post-binman where flash.bin is just the SPL. I'm not
> > sure why users should be hit with a change like that... why are people not
> > having binman produce a flash.bin that was equivalent to pre-binman?
>
> You mean flash.bin not contain u-boot.bin when using binman here?

Any news on that? I just see that in the current master it is not
possible to create a working flash.bin for e.g. the imx8mq_evk board.

-- 
Heiko