[PATCH 1/1] arm: qemu: support qfw

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 22 10:20:40 CET 2021


Hi Asherah,

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 02:12, Asherah Connor <ashe at kivikakk.ee> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom, Simon;
>
> On 21/02/20 05:02:p, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 04:54:41AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Probably create a uclass. I expect there are operations and some
> > > private data. We also need to think about testing, since all uclasses
> > > need a sandbox test.
> >
> > Well, need a test.  Since this is something for qemu, which is already a
> > virtual platform, I'd be quite happy to see this tested in the qemu
> > platforms that will support it and then not sandbox.
>
> I've completed the rewrite to uclass and will be sending the next
> version of the patch series along shortly.  I'm now looking to complete
> the tests.
>
> Tom, what do you have in mind when you say "see this tested in the qemu
> platforms that will support it"?  It looks like we don't have any
> existing tests that use qemu, with the exception of
> test/nokia_rx51_test.sh, which doesn't look like anything to pattern
> from.
>
> A simple sandbox test in test/dm looks like it shouldn't be much work,
> if it's ideal.

Yes I would encourage that since it will be covered by the common
'make qcheck' case in local testing and is therefore easy for people
to run and debug.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list