[PATCH 1/1] arm: qemu: support qfw

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 22.02.21 10:12, Asherah Connor wrote:
> Hi Tom, Simon;
>
> On 21/02/20 05:02:p, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 04:54:41AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Probably create a uclass. I expect there are operations and some
>>> private data. We also need to think about testing, since all uclasses
>>> need a sandbox test.
>>
>> Well, need a test.  Since this is something for qemu, which is already a
>> virtual platform, I'd be quite happy to see this tested in the qemu
>> platforms that will support it and then not sandbox.
>
> I've completed the rewrite to uclass and will be sending the next
> version of the patch series along shortly.  I'm now looking to complete
> the tests.
>
> Tom, what do you have in mind when you say "see this tested in the qemu
> platforms that will support it"?  It looks like we don't have any
> existing tests that use qemu, with the exception of
> test/nokia_rx51_test.sh, which doesn't look like anything to pattern
> from.

If you look into a Gitlab job log like
https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/225922 you will see a lot of
tests executed.'on QEMU.

Have a look into file .gitlab-ci.yml for variables TEST_PY* and at
https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks.

In https://github.com/swarren/uboot-test-hooks you will have to change
bin/travis-ci/conf.qemu_arm64_na, bin/travis-ci/conf.qemu_arm64_na to
enable the framebuffer device.

Best regards

Heinrich

>
> A simple sandbox test in test/dm looks like it shouldn't be much work,
> if it's ideal.
>
> Best,
>
> Asherah
>