[PATCH 04/11] arm: mach-k3: Introduce the basic files to support AM62

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:08:32PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/04/22 9:57 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 07:39:24PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/am625_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am625_init.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000..ee902a774e
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am625_init.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * AM625: SoC specific initialization
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2020-2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> >> + *	Suman Anna <s-anna at ti.com>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <common.h>
> >> +#include <spl.h>
> >> +#include <asm/io.h>
> >> +#include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
> >> +#include <asm/arch/sysfw-loader.h>
> >> +#include "common.h"
> >> +#include <dm.h>
> >> +#include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
> >> +#include <dm/pinctrl.h>
> > 
> > Er, common.h twice? 
> 
> Second one refers to arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h

OK, lets rename that, and see what info there we can put elsewhere.

> > Please re-check this, and then also drop common.h
> > (here and elsewhere) as it only includes other headers and we should
> > avoid it when possible.  
> 
> Sure, will do.
> 
> > In fact, checkpatch.pl complains about both
> > dm.h and common.h so please address series-wide, thanks.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, it doesn't ;(

Ah, right.  It only checks for inside of headers.  But still should be
avoided.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20220415/c122ec96/attachment.sig>