[PATCH V2 01/49] spl: imx8mm: enlarge SPL_MAX_SIZE

[Frieder Schrempf]

Am 05.07.22 um 04:08 schrieb Peng Fan:
> 
> 
> On 7/5/2022 9:35 AM, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/29/2022 6:09 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>>> Am 27.06.22 um 05:24 schrieb Peng Fan (OSS):
>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>>>
>>>> The CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE could be 0x27000 for i.MX8MM when SPL_TEXT_BASE
>>>> set to 0x7E1000.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    common/spl/Kconfig                            | 1 +
>>>>    configs/imx8mm-cl-iot-gate-optee_defconfig    | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm-cl-iot-gate_defconfig          | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2_defconfig  | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2_defconfig | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm-mx8menlo_defconfig             | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm_beacon_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm_data_modul_edm_sbc_defconfig   | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm_evk_defconfig                  | 1 -
>>>>    configs/imx8mm_venice_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>>    configs/phycore-imx8mm_defconfig              | 1 -
>>>>    configs/verdin-imx8mm_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>>    12 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Is there any reason, why you didn't include kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig
>>> in this patch?
>>
>> No specific reason. I may overlook kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig,
>> but it not matter. The reason I did this patch, is a few boards
>> reached its size limitation, so I enlarge to avoid build break.
>>
>> keep kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig as 0x25000 or move to 0x27000,
>> both are ok. If you wanna enlarge, please do a new patch,
>> I not wanna respin this large patchset, unless there are some
>> major comments.
> 
> Just rebase the patchset based on origin/next, and also see
> a few comments from Net maintainer. Will respin this patchset,
> so I will include kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig.

Thanks a lot, Peng!