[PATCH V2 01/49] spl: imx8mm: enlarge SPL_MAX_SIZE

[Peng Fan]

On 7/5/2022 9:35 AM, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/29/2022 6:09 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
>> Am 27.06.22 um 05:24 schrieb Peng Fan (OSS):
>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>>
>>> The CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE could be 0x27000 for i.MX8MM when SPL_TEXT_BASE
>>> set to 0x7E1000.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>>    common/spl/Kconfig                            | 1 +
>>>    configs/imx8mm-cl-iot-gate-optee_defconfig    | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm-cl-iot-gate_defconfig          | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2_defconfig  | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2_defconfig | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm-mx8menlo_defconfig             | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm_beacon_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm_data_modul_edm_sbc_defconfig   | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm_evk_defconfig                  | 1 -
>>>    configs/imx8mm_venice_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>    configs/phycore-imx8mm_defconfig              | 1 -
>>>    configs/verdin-imx8mm_defconfig               | 1 -
>>>    12 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> Is there any reason, why you didn't include kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig
>> in this patch?
> 
> No specific reason. I may overlook kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig,
> but it not matter. The reason I did this patch, is a few boards
> reached its size limitation, so I enlarge to avoid build break.
> 
> keep kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig as 0x25000 or move to 0x27000,
> both are ok. If you wanna enlarge, please do a new patch,
> I not wanna respin this large patchset, unless there are some
> major comments.

Just rebase the patchset based on origin/next, and also see
a few comments from Net maintainer. Will respin this patchset,
so I will include kontron-sl-mx8mm_defconfig.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.