[PATCH v1 1/2] TO BE FOLDED: x86: tangier: Add FADT to the chain

[Bin Meng]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:28 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Simon's patch missed the FADT to be added to the chain, hence all
> > the issues on Intel Tangier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c b/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > index 01b30553818c..ffaa56ab6f87 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ static int tangier_write_fadt(struct acpi_ctx *ctx,
> >
> >         header->checksum = table_compute_checksum(fadt, header->length);
> >
> > +       acpi_add_table(ctx, fadt);
> > +
> >         acpi_inc(ctx, sizeof(struct acpi_fadt));
> >
> >         return 0;
> > --
>
> Which commit should we squash this patch in?
>

Ah, I see this patch is already included in Simon's patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230901112707.v3.1.I61008e563b1209243a9a7f2b66073b4737ff82d1@changeid/

I am going to apply Simon's patch unless you guys say I am looking at
the wrong patch :)

Regards,
Bin