[PATCH v1 1/2] TO BE FOLDED: x86: tangier: Add FADT to the chain

[Simon Glass]

Hi Bin,

On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 01:56, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:28 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Simon's patch missed the FADT to be added to the chain, hence all
> > > the issues on Intel Tangier.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c b/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > > index 01b30553818c..ffaa56ab6f87 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/tangier/acpi.c
> > > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ static int tangier_write_fadt(struct acpi_ctx *ctx,
> > >
> > >         header->checksum = table_compute_checksum(fadt, header->length);
> > >
> > > +       acpi_add_table(ctx, fadt);
> > > +
> > >         acpi_inc(ctx, sizeof(struct acpi_fadt));
> > >
> > >         return 0;
> > > --
> >
> > Which commit should we squash this patch in?
> >
>
> Ah, I see this patch is already included in Simon's patch:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230901112707.v3.1.I61008e563b1209243a9a7f2b66073b4737ff82d1@changeid/
>
> I am going to apply Simon's patch unless you guys say I am looking at
> the wrong patch :)

Yes, that's it.

Regards,
Simon