[PATCH v2 10/13] arm: dts: introduce am62p5 uboot dts files

[Bryan Brattlof]

Hi Andrew!

On February  2, 2024 thus sayeth Andrew Davis:
> On 1/31/24 9:06 PM, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > Include the uboot device tree files needed to boot the board.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb at ti.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/dts/Makefile                      |    2 +
> >   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-ddr-lp4-50-1600.dtsi | 2800 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-sk-binman.dtsi       |  173 ++
> >   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p5-r5-sk.dts           |  101 +
> >   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p5-sk-u-boot.dtsi      |   49 +
> >   arch/arm/mach-k3/Makefile                  |    1 +
> >   arch/arm/mach-k3/am62p5_init.c             |    4 +-
> >   dts/arch/arm64/ti                          |    1 +
> >   8 files changed, 3129 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-ddr-lp4-50-1600.dtsi
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-sk-binman.dtsi
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p5-r5-sk.dts
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p5-sk-u-boot.dtsi
> >   create mode 120000 dts/arch/arm64/ti
> > 

...

> > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-ddr-lp4-50-1600.dtsi 
> > b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-ddr-lp4-50-1600.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..f66435201530f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62p-ddr-lp4-50-1600.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2800 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * This file was generated with the
> > + * AM62Px SysConfig DDR Subsystem Register Configuration Tool v0.10.02
> > + * Thu Jan 25 2024 10:43:46 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)
> > + * DDR Type: LPDDR4
> > + * F0 = 50MHz    F1 = NA     F2 = 1600MHz
> > + * Density (per channel): 16Gb
> > + * Number of Ranks: 2
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define DDRSS_PLL_FHS_CNT 5
> > +#define DDRSS_PLL_FREQUENCY_1 800000000
> > +#define DDRSS_PLL_FREQUENCY_2 800000000
> > +#define DDRSS_SDRAM_IDX 17
> > +#define DDRSS_REGION_IDX 17
> > +
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_0_DATA 0x00000B00
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_1_DATA 0x00000000
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_2_DATA 0x00000000
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_3_DATA 0x00000000
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_4_DATA 0x00000000
> > +#define DDRSS_CTL_5_DATA 0x00000000
> 
> I wonder if it would be better to generate this file
> during build..
> 

Yeah we can save a lot of space by removing tons of these registers 
writing 0x0 to the reserved ranges... The section for the different PHYs 
is particularly aggravating.

I told Simon and Marex last year I'd get to it once I find some free 
cycles and then I went and had a son ;) but it's still in the backlog 

> 
> > +&main_bcdma {
> > +	reg = <0x00 0x485c0100 0x00 0x100>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4c000000 0x00 0x20000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4a820000 0x00 0x20000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4aa40000 0x00 0x20000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4bc00000 0x00 0x100000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x48600000 0x00 0x8000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x484a4000 0x00 0x2000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x484c2000 0x00 0x2000>;
> > +	reg-names = "gcfg", "bchanrt", "rchanrt", "tchanrt",
> > +		    "ringrt", "cfg", "tchan", "rchan";
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Do we still need these? Thought they got fixed kernel side already.

Ah you're right I missed that i'll remove this in v2

> 
> > +&main_pktdma {
> > +	reg = <0x00 0x485c0000 0x00 0x100>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4a800000 0x00 0x20000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4aa00000 0x00 0x40000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x4b800000 0x00 0x400000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x485e0000 0x00 0x20000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x484a0000 0x00 0x4000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x484c0000 0x00 0x2000>,
> > +	      <0x00 0x48430000 0x00 0x4000>;
> > +	reg-names = "gcfg", "rchanrt", "tchanrt", "ringrt",
> > +		    "cfg", "tchan", "rchan", "rflow";
> > +};
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-k3/Makefile
> > index 42161376469e2..820b313a83c23 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/Makefile
> > @@ -20,5 +20,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_J721S2) += j721s2_init.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM642) += am642_init.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM625) += am625_init.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM62A7) += am62a7_init.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM62P5) += am62p5_init.o
> >   endif
> >   obj-y += common.o security.o
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/am62p5_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am62p5_init.c
> > index 5b6795cc7d246..9ff877d5d26e8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/am62p5_init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am62p5_init.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> >   	 * through a SYSFW PM-init step and will need a re-init in some way
> >   	 * due to changing module clock frequencies.
> >   	 */
> > -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_K3_EARLY_CONS))
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_K3_EARLY_CONS)) {
> 
> Looks like fixes for a previous patch that didn't get squashed.
>

haha Oops good catch.. I'll fixup this properly


Thanks for the review Andrew
~Bryan