[Uboot-stm32] [PATCH v3 1/7] ofnode: support panel-timings in ofnode_decode_display_timing
Raphaël Gallais-Pou
rgallaispou at gmail.com
Sun Nov 2 02:09:50 CET 2025
Le Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Simon Glass a écrit :
> Hi Raphael,
>
> On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 14:53, Raphael Gallais-Pou
> <raphael.gallais-pou at foss.st.com> wrote:
> >
> > The "Display Timings" in panel-common.yaml can be provided by 2 properties
> > - panel-timing: when display panels are restricted to a single resolution
> > the "panel-timing" node expresses the required timings.
> > - display-timings: several resolutions with different timings are supported
> > with several timing subnode of "display-timings" node
> >
> > This patch update the parsing function to handle this 2 possibility
> > when index = 0.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre at foss.st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou at foss.st.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/core/ofnode.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/core/ofnode.c b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> > index e040e3f2806ffe74c58dcd82f36307351acd5a99..5a721b46e5a3214e7bd437739776362c2d22a3c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> > +++ b/drivers/core/ofnode.c
> > @@ -1221,13 +1221,16 @@ int ofnode_decode_display_timing(ofnode parent, int index,
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > timings = ofnode_find_subnode(parent, "display-timings");
> > - if (!ofnode_valid(timings))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - i = 0;
> > - ofnode_for_each_subnode(node, timings) {
> > - if (i++ == index)
> > - break;
> > + if (ofnode_valid(timings)) {
> > + i = 0;
> > + ofnode_for_each_subnode(node, timings) {
> > + if (i++ == index)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + if (index != 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + node = ofnode_find_subnode(parent, "panel-timing");
> > }
> >
> > if (!ofnode_valid(node))
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Please add a test for this in test/dm/ofnode.c
Hi Simon,
I'll gladly do that, but I haven't write and use any test in U-Boot. So
it is a bit foggy how to implement it.
Do we want to create a fake device-tree and test each configuration or
do we want to test in the _current_ device-tree if timings are correctly
set according to the index value ?
Best regards,
Raphaël
>
> Regards,
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Uboot-stm32 mailing list
> Uboot-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
> https://st-md-mailman.stormreply.com/mailman/listinfo/uboot-stm32
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list